Cloud Of The Doubt

In this paper we consider one of the situations in which to enter the market is not recommended. I called this time «a cloud of doubt». Typically, the cloud is formed by passing the important points of resistance / support or clash of bulls and bears. Or when is not clear where to move the market. Let's try together to understand this situation and not get «elk». Let one of the few such situations. And a recent review of Perforation resistance 1.2940. I explain how I found this resistance, as many traders look for the data in different projections, etc., at a time when everyone can easily find this level, I even have to say - is required to be able to find. Well move on to the case.

Weekly schedule:



We see from the left point, the box in the red circle, it is just above the maxima will be located an emotional level of resistance to 10P smaller, more does not matter, microscopic precision is not necessary. So we found our resistance.

The second circle is our place for research. Many will say to say that for easy stories to tell and analyze the past already. Say - «show better, where will tomorrow evra?». I have an answer to this question. I say - I do not know. I always go for the price, but do not predict it, where it will be tomorrow, in five minutes, after a week or a year.

So, continue. Switching to a shorter period - for full-time schedule.

For further analysis we will use the 5 tools. SMA (21), SMA (180), Stohastic (7,10,3), Parabolic SAR and MACD Siberian standard settings.

On the day seeing all the signs of a turn upward trend. MACD gave a signal to sell it proves that the mood of the crowd at the station, Stochastics also had confirmation - leave the area perekuplennosti thereby signaling the beginning of sales.

Got to two false signals from different indicators. What conclusion?

Close to such levels do not trust these indicators? - Of course not.

Parabolika, short and long, medium, showed a steady upward trend.

There was a breakthrough because even a short sliding.

Especially at this site parabolika was under the protection, ie for short-medium. And it said that the trend is protected. Why do so many traders selling at this level, for me personally - it is not clear.

I think that at this level of sales could perform only after a brief breakdown rolling and changing rate parabolika. It thus would be a confirmation signal from the indicators on early sales. This one could finish the talk, laugh, and show the finger at those who have had the imprudence to sell here. But the depth and go on. If you carefully consider the candles that surrounded by a red circle, you will find a variety of false turning combinations.

That is what I call «The big cloud of doubt». Then explain why so called it.

Four schedule


Consider now the site for 4ch and 1h schedules.

At 4ch graphics on this site has been noticed several bear MACD-divergence, any MACD-Histogram hill after a large, bear seen as a signal for the sales, Stochastics had confirmation of these signals, a total of about 3 diversification, I would like to note that srabotki enough good, profit can be caught with the right approach, well now we do not know. To explain this behavior of the crowd easily. At these sites the crowd divided into two categories: those who work on the samples, and those of a breakthrough. Bears are looking for a signal to any sale of bulls and of the signals to buy. When leaving the price for resistance, traders, playing to return to the channel, considering diversification MASD and Stochastics signal the beginning of sales, and drive the price to have the so-called support. There they are happy to meet with the bulls to perceive touch on the support price as a signal to buy - on the rebound. "

That's the beginning and the chaos of battle between the bulls and bears. This is again - "a cloud of doubt."

At the station an active mood, a lot of sales and a lot of shopping. Here every doubt, think how not to miss a turn and a more advantageous position to enter, hence the name.

So when will we enter into the market? - You ask.

There are two options.

Option 1:

You can settle with the bear diversification MACD (I noted them with red circles - this is a confirmation 4ch divergence, and more accurate input.), So you go along with the bears, who think that this is a false break. But because we dodge the crowds, and we will go in a collision with the bulls. (The points of collision with the bulls, it signals that the bulls take to buy, then we will consider)

2.Mozhete enter the tangency points of the long moving average (they are marked by green circles), is a foot lower than the resistance.

The points of collision bears and bulls, and there - "the clouds of doubt."

Time schedule:


During the symposium leave. See you soon.
Tolstykh profit and wicked moose

In this paper we consider one of the situations in which to enter the market is not recommended. I called this time «a cloud of doubt». Typically, the cloud is formed by passing the important points of resistance / support or clash of bulls and bears. Or when is not clear where to move the market. Let's try together to understand this situation and not get «elk». Let one of the few such situations. And a recent review of Perforation resistance 1.2940. I explain how I found this resistance, as many traders look for the data in different projections, etc., at a time when everyone can easily find this level, I even have to say - is required to be able to find. Well move on to the case.

Get your bookkeeping done at half the cost and half the pressure!

Bookkeeping is one of those business activities that can’t be ignored no matter how mundane and uninteresting it is. It is one of the quintessential things for accounts. Incorrect bookkeeping will result in inaccurate accounts books. This would ensue a whole needle in a haystack kind of game which will eventually point to some silly error in the bookkeeping entry.   Was the search worth it?


Absolutely not.  Something that silly could have been avoided if the business owner was paying attention to the bookkeeping. A rookie mistake like this has cost a lot of time and not to mention, extra billable hours. It is entirely self defeating to be doing bookkeeping yourself and to need an accountant/bookkeeper to clear the mess later on. It costs more and is not free from pressure.

Here is how you can get your bookkeeping done at lesser cost

If you haven’t heard of Outsourced bookkeeping services, it is of no surprise that you are still struggling with bookkeeping. This is one way where you can get a bookkeeper to do your task and pay less for it. How is it possible?

The difference in currency value allows you to get bookkeeping help for cheap in countries like India and Philippines. The person assigned to your task is a qualified bookkeeper. You can be sure that he/she is someone with a degree in accounting. They work for you because you are likely to be paying better than what they would get in their city.

You as a business owner will benefit greatly from the cost savings. Outsourced services such as this one will cost you less than half of what a bookkeeper will cost you in your city. This is indeed the best way to get bookkeeping done on a budget.

What is animal systematic and describe classification of organization

Animal Systematics:

The goal of animal systematics is to arrange animals into group, that reflect evolutionary relationship.

Monophyletic group: When groups include single ancestral species and all of its descendents such a group is called monophyletic group, in searching out monophyletic groups, taxonomists look for animal attributes called characters that indicate relatedness.

Character: A character is virtually anything that has a genetic basis and can be measured from an anatomical feature to a sequence of nitrogenous bases in DNA or RNA.

Polyphyletic groups: They have members that can be traced to separate ancestors. Since each group should have single ancestor, a polyphyletic group reflects insufficient knowledge of the group.

Paraphyletic group: It includes some, but not all, members of a lineage. Paraphyletic groups result when knowledge of the group is insufficient.

Evolutionary Systematics: It is the oldest of three approaches. It is also called traditional approach. A basic assumption of evolutionary systematics is that organisms closely related to an ancestor will resemble that ancestor more closely than they resemble distantly related organisms. Two kinds of similarities between organisms are recognized.

(1) Homologies are resemblances that result from common ancestry and are useful in classifying animals. Example is the similar arrangement of bones in the wing of a bird and the arm of human.

(2) Analogies are resemblances that result from organisms adapting under similar evolutionary pressures. This process is sometimes called convergent evolution. Analogies do not reflect common ancestry and are not used in animal taxonomy e.g. similarity between wings of birds and insects in an analogy. Evolutionary systematics often portray the results of their work on phylogenetic trees where organisms are grouped according to their evolutionary relationships.

Numerical Taxonomy: It emerged during 1950s and 1960s and represents opposite end of the spectrum from evolutionary systematics. The founders of numerical taxonomy believed that the criteria for grouping taxa had become too arbitrary. They tried to make taxonomy more objective.

Taxonomists use mathematical models and compute aided techniques to group samples of organisms according to overall similarity. They do not attempt to distinguish between homologies and analogies. Difference between evolutionary systematic and numerical taxonomy is that numerical taxonomists limit discussion of evolutionary relationships to closely related taxa. Numerical taxonomy is the least popular of three taxonomic schools. However; all taxonomists use compute programme that numerical taxonomists developed.

Phylogenetic Systematics: It is third approach to animal systematic. The goal of cladistics is similar to evolutionary systematics the generation of hypotheses of genealogical relationships among monophyletic groups of organisms. Cladists contend that their methods are more open to analysis and testing and thus are more scientific, than those of evolutionary systematics.

Like evolutionary systematics, cladists differentiate between homologous and analogies. They believe that homologies of recent origin are most useful in phylogenetic studies.

Symplesiomorphies: Characters that all members of a group share are referred to as symplesiomorphies. (sym=together+plesio=near+morphe=form).

These characters are homologues that may indicate a shared ancestry but they are useless in describing relationships within the group.

Out group: To decide what character is ancestral from a group of organisms. Cladists look for a related group of organisms called an out group that are included in the study group.

Synapomorphies: Characters that have arisen since common ancestry with the out group are called derived characters or synopomorphies (syn=together, apo=away and morphe=form).

Cladogram: A cladogram is interpreted as a family tree depicting a hypothesis regarding monphyletic lineages. New data is the form of newly investigated characters or reinterpretation of old data are used to test the hypothesis, the cladogram describes. The tumicates and cephalochordates are an out group for the entire vertebrate lineage. Derived characters are

(1) Extra embryonic membrane is a synapomorphy used to define the clade containing the reptiles, birds and mammals and absent in any of the fish taxa or the amphibians.

(2) Derived characters, the shell, distinguishes turtles, from all other members of the clade

(3) Skill characters distinguish the lizard/crocodile bird lineage from the mammal lineage

(4) and haris, mammary glands and endothermy is a unique mammalian character combination. A synapomorphy at one level of taxonomy may be a symplesiomorphy at different levels of taxonomy. Extra embryonic membrane is synapomorphic for reptiles, birds and mammals because it is ancestral for the clade and cannot be used to distinguish among members of these three groups. Zoologists widely accept cladistcs. This acceptance has resulted in some non traditional interpretations of animal phylogeny. Generations of taxonomists assigned class level status (Aves) to birds and reptilian to reptiles.

Cladistic analysis: It has show that birds are more closely tried by common ancestry to alligators and crocodiles than to any other group.

According to cladistics interpretation birds and crocodiles should be assigned to a group that reflects this close common ancestry. Birds would become a subgroup within larger group that included both birds and reptiles. Crocodiles would be depicted more closely related to birds than they would be to snakes and lizards.

Traditional evolutionary systematics maintain that the traditional interpretation is still correct because it takes into account the greater importance of key characters of birds (e.g. feathers and endothermy) that make the group unique. Cladists support their position by pointing out that the designation of key characters involves value judgments that cannot be tested. Debates are the fuel that force scientists to examine old assumptions. Animal systematics is certain to be lively and exciting field in future years.

What do you know about kingdoms of life

In 1969, Whittaker described a system of classification that distinguished between kingdom according to cellular organization and mode of nutrition. According to this system members of kingdom monera are bacteria and cyanobacteria. They are prokaryotes members of kingdom protista are eukaryotic and consist of single cells or colonies of cells. Members of kingdom plantae are eukaryotic, multi-cellular and photosynthetic. Plants have walled cells and are usually non motile. Members of kingdom fungi are also eukaryotic and multi-cellular. They also have walled cells and are usually non motile. Fungi are decomposers. Members of kingdom animalia are eukaryotic and multi-cellular and they usually feed by ingesting other organisms or parts of other organisms. Their cells lack walls and they are usually motile.

For the first two billion years of life on the earth, living forms were prokaryotic microbes. Molecular studies of variations in base sequences of ribosomal RNA from more than two thousand organisms are providing evidence of relationship rooted within this two billion year period. Emerging picture is that five kingdoms do not represent distinct evolutionary lineages.

Evolutionary Conservation: Ribosomal RNA is excellent for studying the evolution of early life on earth. It is an ancient molecule and it is present and retains its function in virtually all organisms. In addition ribosomal RNA changes very slowly. This showness of change is called evolutionary conservation. It indicates that the protein producing machinery of a cell can tolerate little change and still retain its vital function. Closely related organisms (recently diverged from a common ancestory) are likely to have similar ribosomal RNAs. Distantly related organisms have ribosomal RNAs that are less similar but the differences are small enough that the relationship to some ancestral molecules are still apparent.

Method: Molecular systematic compare the base sequences in ribosomal RNA of different organisms to find the number of positions in RNAs where bases are different. They enter these data into computer programmes and examine all possible relationships among different organisms. The systematic then decide which arrangement of the organisms best explains the data.

Conclusion: Studies of ribosomal RNA have let systematic to the conclusion that all life shares a common ancestor and that there are three major evolutionary lineages. Each of these lineage is called domain. Archara are prokaryotic microbes that live in extreme environments such as high temperature rift valleys on the ocean floor or high salt or acidic environments. They environments may reflect conditions on the earth at the time of life’s origin. The archara are the most primitive life forms known. Ancient archaras gave rise to two other domains of organisms Eubacteria and Eukarya. Eubacteria are true bacteria and are prokaryotic micro-organisms. Eukarya include all eukaryotic organisms eukaraya diverged more recently related to Archara than Eubacteria to Archara.

Eubacteria to Archara:

Eukarya arose about 1.5 billion years ago. Photosynthetic accumulation of oxygen in the atmosphere probably resulted in the production of ozone which shielded the planet from ultra violet light. Eukarya then underwent late, but raid, evolutionary diversification into modern lineages of protests, fungi, plants and animals.